Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Feature Article



NORTH KOREA WARNS OF ALL-OUT WAR

By the CNN Wire Staff

S T O R Y    H I G H L I G H T S

  • North Korea continues to protest U.S. and South Korea's military drills
  • The U.S. and South Korean drills will go on until Friday
  • The drills are a response to the sinking of a South Korean ship, the U.S. has said

(CNN) -- North Korea warned Tuesday that the continuing military drills by the United States and South Korea could lead to "all-out war any time."

The firmly-worded message was published in North Korea's state-run KCNA news service.

"If the U.S. and the South Korean war-like forces fire even a shell into the inviolable land and territorial waters of the DPRK, they will have to pay dearly for this," the news service report said.

South Korea and the United States launched joint anti-submarine military exercises on Monday, drawing consternation from North Korea.

Seoul and Washington postponed the exercises earlier this month because of a tropical storm.

The drills, which are to run through Friday, are "designed to send a clear message of deterrence to North Korea," U.S. Forces Korea have said.

U.S. officials have said the exercises off the western coast of the Korean peninsula are in response to North Korea's sinking of a South Korean warship in March.

In May, a report from South Korea blamed the North for sinking the Cheonan warship with a torpedo, killing 46 sailors.

North Korea denies sinking the ship and says South Korea and the United States are using it as a pretext to conduct the war games.

The drills also come after the November 23 shelling of a South Korean island by North Korea. The attack on Yeonpyeong Island killed four South Koreans and injured 15 others.

U.S. Navy crew members work on the aircraft carrier USS
 George Washington during a joint U.S.- South Korean military exercise



Brink of War

By Matt Gurney


November 24, 2010 - Early Tuesday morning, local time, South Korean military forces were conducting a military exercise from a Marine base on the island of Yeonpyeong. The exercise involved firing artillery from the base, out over the Yellow Sea, to the south of the island — and away from North Korean territory.

North Korea contacted the South during the exercise and demanded that the South cease fire. When the South refused to comply with the North’s demand, North Korea opened fire [1] on Yeonpyeong Island, territory that has been recognized by the United Nations as belonging to the South for 57 years.

This attack is the most serious incident between the two nations since they were divided after the Second World War.

The North Korean attack, involving approximately 100 artillery shells, hit the base on Yeonpyeong, killing two [2] South Korean Marines and wounding 15 others. The North also shelled several civilian villages around the base. It is not known whether or not the civilian areas were intentionally targeted or were hit due to failures in North Korean targeting, but multiple (reports range from several to several dozen) private homes and buildings were destroyed. The island’s civilian population quickly sought shelter underground, but three civilians were still wounded in the attack.

South Korea was not long in responding. It immediately returned fire with its own artillery; while the North has of course not revealed its own losses, the South Korean military is a modern, well-equipped fighting force, and it’s near certain that they hit what they were aiming at. North Korean casualties are likely. The South also scrambled F-16 fighter jets [3] to the area, but there are no reports yet as to whether or not they engaged any targets in North Korea. The South Korean military, while holding off on any further reaction to the North’s attack, is now at its maximum state of alert.

It is difficult to overstate the gravity of Tuesday’s attack. The two Koreas are both heavily armed nations, locked in a permanent state of war since a truce ended the Korean War in 1953. The two armies face off against each other across the Demilitarized Zone, where the modern military of South Korea, some 600,000 strong, is opposite a larger North Korean military, of an estimated one million troops, armed with mid-20th century weapons.

The North’s technological backwardness should not cause anyone to underestimate it. Quantity has a quality on its own, and in a final battle between the larger Cold War-era force and the modern, mobile South Koreans, while the South would likely win, it would not do so cheaply. Its capital city, Seoul, is within artillery range of North Korean positions, and as the North has shown today, it is now willing to use its artillery against South Korean soil. Any war between the two would be devastating in both lives and property and would send shockwaves through the fragile global economy.

This is not the first time that the South has been provoked by North Korea.

Indeed, it was only eight months ago, in March,that the North Korean Navy launched an unprovoked attack [4] upon the South. The South Korean warship Cheonan was torpedoed as it sailed the waters near Yeonpyeong Island. The torpedo explosion, which struck with no warning, blew the Cheonan in half. She went down quickly, taking 46 men with her. Another man, a South Korean rescue diver, would later die during search and recovery efforts to the Cheonan’s hulk.

Map: Yeonpyeong Island, S. Korea






Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, November 19, 2010

Feature Article

Rep. Duncan Blasts TSA

"Pat Downs," Scanners on House Floor



From: Rep John Duncan - R-TN  | November 17, 2010

Rep. John J. Duncan Jr., former Chairman of the House Aviation Subcommittee and the current top Republican on the House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, blasts TSA's invasive "pat downs" during a speech on the floor of the House of Representatives on November 17, 2010. Duncan also questions the role of lucrative government contracts in TSA's new naked body scanning machines. The text of the speech is copied below:



"Mr. Speaker:

A nationwide revolt is developing over the body scanners at the airports, and it should.

Hundreds of thousands of frequent fliers who fly each week are upset about getting these frequent doses of radiation.

Parents are upset about being forced to have their children radiated or being touched inappropriately by an unrelated adult.

There is already plenty of security at the airport, but now we are going to spend up to $300 million to install 1,000 scanners.

This is much more about money than it is about security.

The former secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, represents Rapiscan, the company which is selling these scanners to his former department.

Far too many federal contracts are sweetheart, insider deals.

Companies hire former high ranking federal officials, and then magically, those companies get hugely profitable federal contracts.

The American people should not have to choose between having full-body radiation or a very embarrassing, intrusive pat-down every time they fly, as if they were criminals.

We need a little more balance and common sense on this."


Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Feature Article

Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates Accepts

2010 American Patriot Award On Behalf of Troops

           By Cheryl Pellerin
        American Forces Press Service




WASHINGTON, Nov. 6, 2010 Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates was awarded the 2010 American Patriot Award last night for outstanding contributions to the intelligence, national security, and defense communities.

In accepting the prestigious award, Gates said he was doing so on behalf of all the young men and women in uniform who serve their country in time of war.

Gates received the National Defense University Foundation’s award at a ceremony here for his contributions during four decades of government service.

“Tonight we sit and enjoy this wonderful occasion and each other’s company, but we must never forget that our comfort and safety are borne on the brave and broad shoulders of those young men and women in uniform,” he said.

In honoring servicemembers, Gates quoted Gen. George C. Marshall, the Army chief of staff during World War II and Nobel Peace Prize winner for whom The Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after the war is named.

“More sacrifices will be required of them to defend the security and freedom of our country in this dangerous new century,” he said. “And it is our duty -- it is, indeed, our sacred obligation -- in Marshall’s words, to make things well for them.”

Their well-being, Gates added, is his continuing highest priority.

Among more than 600 guests were senior defense and military officials, including Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn III, senior administration officials, members of Congress and corporate and community leaders.

In his comments, Gates recognized retired Republic of Korea Army Gen. Paik Sun-yup, who traveled from South Korea to attend the gala.

“For those of you who don’t know,” Gates said, “General Paik was the ROK army’s youngest and fiercest division commander during the Korean War and for nearly six decades has been one of America’s most steadfast friends.

“Sir,” Gates told him, “I’m pleased that you came so far to be here, and thank you.”

Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Vice Adm. Ann Rondeau and others spoke on Gates’ behalf.

The American Patriot Award is presented each year to a citizen whose sacrifice and dedication stand out as remarkable,” Rondeau, president of National Defense University, said.

“To someone who answers the call to public service, patriotism is not a concept. It is a commitment, it is a duty upon which we act,” she added. “This level of commitment is what National Defense University Foundation prizes above all else. It is what we recognize and acknowledge every year and again this year.”

Cartwright thanked the university staff, professors, executives and the National Defense University Foundation for “making a difference” to all the field-grade officers and general officers who attend the institution, educating themselves and enriching their spirits.

One of several standing ovations of the evening acknowledged the gala’s special guests -- more than 40 members from each military service who were part of the 2010 Sponsor a Patriot program. Their commanders chose them based on character and dedication to country, and some came from around the world.

In a video message played during the celebration, former President George H.W. Bush highlighted Gates’ “monumental” contributions to his country.

“For eight presidents, having gone from raw recruit to CIA director and now secretary of defense, Robert Gates has been wisely and relentlessly fighting and winning America’s wars,” Bush said.

The American Patriot Award recognizes exceptional Americans who demonstrate a love of country and whose leadership and dedication symbolize U.S. ideals, values and democratic principles.

Past award recipients include former President George H.W. Bush; former Secretaries of State retired Army Gen. Colin Powell and Henry Kissinger; Army Gen. David Petraeus and the men and women of Central Command; astronaut and retired U.S. Senator John Glenn; and former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger.

Beyond honoring the recipients, the gala supports the university and its mission of preparing military and civilian leaders from the United States and other countries to examine national and international security challenges through educational and research programs, professional exchanges and outreach.

The main campus is at Fort Lesley McNair in Washington.

The National Defense University Foundation is a nonprofit organization that has provided private-sector support for the National Defense University for more than 28 years.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 22, 2010

Feature Article


OCTOBER 2010
NATIONAL
CYBERSECURITY
 AWARENESS MONTH


Welcome and thank you so very much for visiting your Choice America Network Feature Article Archives Blog.

October is National CyberSecurity Awareness month and we at Choice America Network encourage everyone to please take time out to stop and think about safely connecting to what has become the fastest growing medium in our world - the Internet - the World Wide Web.

I encourage and hope you visit each website behind this campaign - StaySafeOnline.org and learn more about the National Cyber Security Alliance. All of us can most certainly agree that the Internet has and will continually reshape society and culture via the way we communicate on this ever changing Third Rock from the Sun, therefore the Alliance is all about using the internet safely and securely while exposing and combating the dangers we all may unfortunately encounter on-line.

In March of this year, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) issued it's 2009 Annual Report on Internet Crime. The Report contained current information on fraudulent activity on the Internet.

The following is information released by the IC3 in their Annual Report:

Online crime complaints increased substantially once again last year, according to the report. The IC3 received a total of 336,655 complaints, a 22.3 percent increase from 2008. The total loss linked to online fraud was $559.7 million; this is up from $265 million in 2008.



       Year Complaint:        Received  Dollar Loss:
 2009 336,655              $559.7 million
2008 275,284               $265   million
   2007 206,884              $239.09 million
   2006 207,492               $198.44 million
   2005 231,493               $183.12 million


Although the complaints consisted of a variety of fraud types, advanced fee scams that fraudulently used the FBI's name ranked number one (16.6 percent). Non-delivery of merchandise and/or payment was the second most reported offense (11.9 percent).


The 2009 Annual Report details information related to the volume and scope of complaints, complainant and perpetrator characteristics, geographical data, most frequently reported scams and results of IC3 referrals. The report is posted in its entirety on the IC3 Website.

Law enforcement relies on the corporate sector and citizens to report when they encounter on-line suspicious activity so these schemes can be investigated and criminals can be arrested,” stated Peter Trahon, Section Chief of the FBI's Cyber Division. “Computer users are encouraged to have up-to-date security protection on their devices and evaluate email solicitations they receive with a healthy skepticism—if something seems too good to be true, it likely is.”

NW3C Director Donald Brackman said the report's findings underscore the threat posed by cyber criminals. “The figures contained in this report indicate that criminals are continuing to take full advantage of the anonymity afforded them by the Internet. They are also developing increasingly sophisticated means of defrauding unsuspecting consumers. Internet crime is evolving in ways we couldn't have imagined just five years ago.” But Brackman sounded an optimistic tone about the future. “With the public’s continued support, law enforcement will be better able to track down these perpetrators and bring them to justice.”

The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is a joint operation between the FBI, the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C) and the and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). IC3 receives, develops, and refers criminal complaints regarding the rapidly expanding arena of cyber crime. The IC3 gives the victims of cyber crime a convenient and easy-to-use reporting mechanism utilized to alert authorities of suspected criminal or civil violations. For law enforcement and regulatory agencies at the federal, state, local and international level, the IC3 provides a central referral mechanism for complaints involving Internet-related crimes.

On your Choice America Network Links page you will find additional resources to help you keep your online activities safe from the criminal elements that inhabit the WWW. But with that said, the safety of the internet still depends on YOU and the actions YOU take. It's your world and your life your are sharing everytime you connect.

We must all help to make our internet a safer and better experience for all and report suspected criminal or civil violations. So spread the word, toot your horn and share this information with your family and friends and together we can make everyone's computing a safer and more enjoyable experience inwhich we all can share.

And as always, it's all about Choice,...and it's all about You.

Be safe both on-line and off and again, it's great to have you on your Choice America Network.

Respectfully,

Scott Evans - Publisher - Choice America Network

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Feature Article

Marijuana Soda
Provides a High
Without the Smoke
Analysis by
David Teeghman



One Colorado soda company has developed a line of sodas that have an unusual ingredient: marijuana. Dixie Elixirs has made their drinks available to anyone with a prescription for medical marijuana.

The drinks come in eight different flavors, including pink lemonade, root beer and grape. But if the company really wants to get their drinks into the hands of marijuana lovers, they may want to start working on pizza and nachos flavors.

But marijuana is only legal to consume in 14 states with a prescription from a doctor. So, unless you are one of the approximately half-million people who is a medical marijuana patient, this pot-infused soda won't do you much good.

It's an open secret that you can smoke marijuana and still be a valuable part of society. But when you think of smoking weed, you're more likely to think of Cheech and Chong than the people running the United States government. (Even though at least two U.S. presidents have admitted smoking it.)

The drink makers say part of the reason they developed their line of mary-jane drinks was to remove that "reefer madness" stigma associated with marijuana smokers.

If California voters decide to make recreational marijuana legal this November, you may start seeing these organic sodas (the drink makers really know their audience) in grocery stores and liquor stores right next to the stuff from Pepsi and Coke.

But if Coca-Cola's history is any sign of what the company might do next, they could return to the heady days of putting mind-altering substances in their sodas.

At a time of sagging soda sales, drink makers are looking for a way to boost sales, and marijuana might be the answer. Medical marijuana has already proven an effective way at boosting newspaper sales, of all things. The New York Times reports that medical marijuana ads in small Colorado newspapers boost revenues enough for it to increase the size of its staff.

Photo: Dixie Elixirs


Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Feature Article

  How to tell white lies online

Special to CNN

Editor's note: Brenna Ehrlich and Andrea Bartz are the sarcastic brains behind humor blog and book  Stuff Hipsters Hate. When they're not trolling Brooklyn for new material, Ehrlich works as a news editor at Mashable.com, and Bartz holds the same position at Psychology Today.

(CNN) -- We're all big fat liars. Most of us spit out one or two intentional deceptions a day, and in a week we BS about 30 percent of those with whom we talk one-on-one, according to old but seminal research from the University of Virginia.

Here's the rub: Those stats are from 1996, back when, beyond some basic e-mailing and AOL chat room chatter, the majority of our interactions happened in real life.

If you didn't feel like going on date #2 with that nice but boring dude who couldn't stop talking about his ficuses, or would in reality rather stick your pinkie in a meat grinder than attend your roommate's French horn recital, all you needed was a quick one-time fib and you were in the clear.

Nowadays, you whip up a fabrication about your head cold, and within hours you've been tagged in three Facebook pictures gulping from a beer bong. Consequently, you completely forget your alibi and drunkenly check into that seedy dive bar on Foursquare, broadcasting your true whereabouts to all of the internet.

So, the WWW's making us all a bit more honest, right? Not quite: The UVA research found people were less honest over the phone than in person, probably because it's easier to lie into a phone than to someone's face. With texts, Gchats, FB messages, etc. usurping your vocal cords as communication media of choice, it's not hard to imagine online falsehoods running rampant.

OK, that feels intuitive enough. We're less truthful in writing than in face-to-face conversations -- those increasing infrequent exchanges where people can, like, see you getting all squirmy as you stutter further and further into your clearly fabricated excuse.

But here's the truly disturbing part: This spring, a new study reported that people tell 50 percent more lies via e-mail than in pen-and-paper missives. So this isn't just a written-vs.-spoken thing.

That's right, the internet inherently turns us into unabashed Bill Clintons, probably because we feel like our online jottings are both impermanent and impersonal.

Bottom line: The net's making it both easier to lie and easier to get caught. Read on for a few tips on using the web without getting tangled in your own web of deception.

1. Be vague

Complex excuses sound made up, and the more intricate your story, the more likely you are to eff it up in a later retelling. If you decide to forgo a planned brunch, for example, don't send a lengthy e-mail about how your cat just died and you need to go peddle some clothes at Buffalo Exchange in order to garner the cash to have Fluffy cremated.

Just send an apologetic text claiming you're not feeling well and need a rain check. That kind of statement is pretty hard to fact-check.

2. Tell relevant cohorts about the attempted sham

If you blew off someone's b'day for a late-night, last-minute, half-naked rooftop dance party (who can blame you?), you'll need to make said partially dressed partyers your unwitting accomplices. Why? Because they (those with the cameras and smartphones, that is) hold in their sweating palms the ability to blow your cover with an ill-timed tweet or a time-stamped photo.

Asking friends to hold off on disseminating the incriminating evidence is risky, because the more people you tell, the more possible whistle-blowers you've created. But come on, as soon as the pants-off-dance-off gets rolling, everyone in their right mind is going to reach for their camera, so you better start begging for their cooperation.

3. Become besties with your privacy settings

Evidence of your fib will emerge on one of your social networking streams. Your goal is to keep it contained until enough time's passed that no one will notice the incongruity between your stated plans and actual shenanigans. If you're a hard-core pathological liar, you'll want protected tweets and a closely guarded stable of Facebook friends -- and duh, geotagging services like Foursquare are not for you.

Facebook also lets you control who sees what parts of your profile. (It's kind of hidden -- way to make it easy, Zuckerberg -- so go to Account/Privacy Settings/Customize Settings, and then select Customize next to the elements [such as wall posts] you want to hide from certain groups.)

A little strategy will prevent your co-workers from seeing all those photos of your 33-hour whiskey-tobacco-screamo-music bender in Danny's Bushwick loft -- I mean, your quiet day in bed with a migraine. Ahem.

4. ... or just tell the truth

This all sounds mad complicated, exhausting and generally counter to the fun-ness you're trying to weasel your way into, right? As Clinton learned the hard (heh) way, much of the time lying just ain't worth it. So tell the gentle truth.

Apologize in advance for missing your friend's happy hour, and ask if you can make it up to her next week. Request a personal day instead of calling in with a put-on chest cough.

And save those one or two lies a day for the moments that really count: e.g., when your boss holds up a terrifying picture of his evil-looking children and says, "Gorgeous, aren't they?"

Subscribers and Registered Users may comment on this article at CHOICE PERSPECTIVE 




Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Feature Article

US issues Travel Alert for

Americans in Europe

Intelligence sources say al-Qaeda plans to carry out attacks in the UK, France and Germany

The US government has warned its citizens
 in an official travel advisory to be vigilant travelling in Europe,
amid fears of an al-Qaeda commando-style attack.

The state department advised Americans to take care while in tourist areas.

The department did not specify a country, issuing the updated guidance for the whole of Europe.

Security sources have warned of an al-Qaeda plan to send teams of gunmen to crowded places to kill civilians.

They said cities in the UK, France and Germany were thought to be targets for the militants, in attacks analysts feared could be similar to the 2008 atrocities in Mumbai.

After intelligence details of the plot had been leaked to the US media last week, officials said that the plan had not been stopped but that an attack was not expected to be carried out imminently.

Past attacks

The state department alert said European governments had "taken action to guard against a terrorist attack", but that "terrorists may elect to use a variety of means and weapons and target both official and private interests".

Unfolding threat

16 Sep: France raises terror alert level to "reinforced red", one from top

22 Sep: FBI director Robert Mueller speaks of al-Qaeda threat against Europe

29 Sep: Security sources tell BBC of Mumbai-style plot to seize and kill hostages in Europe

1 Oct: US officials tell reporters Osama Bin Laden may be among planners of attack on Europe

UK travellers warned over Europe

"US citizens are reminded of the potential for terrorists to attack public transportation systems and other tourist infrastructure," the alert sad.

"Terrorists have targeted and attacked subway and rail systems, as well as aviation and maritime services."

Such an alert could have negative consequences for European tourism if travellers fear that there is a risk of terror attacks and cancel their journeys.

However, US citizens were not told to avoid travelling in Europe, and the advisory is less serious than a travel warning.

After the US alert was issued, the UK confirmed it had updated its guidance for travellers in Germany and France, warning of a "high threat" from terrorism.

And UK Home Secretary Theresa May said Britain would continue to work with its allies to combat militants.

"I would urge the public to report any suspicious activity to the police in support of the efforts of our security services to discover, track and disrupt terrorist activity," she said.

French Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux said the threat of a terrorist attack was real, but that the country was not raising its alert level - currently at its second-highest.

"We are analysing what they say. We are taking their comments into account. And we are naturally vigilant," Mr Hortefeux told AP Television News.

Drone attacks

After news of the possible plot first came to light, US anti-terrorism officials were reported to have said that they believed al-Qaeda leaders, including Osama Bin Laden, were involved.

“I won't let any terrorists try to keep me away from enjoying a European vacation” - Jake Novak

No arrests have been made, but European officials said several individuals were still under surveillance.

The suspects include British citizens of Pakistani origin and German citizens of Afghan origin.

Recent US drone raids in Pakistan reportedly targeted al-Qaeda militants linked to the plans.

US forces have carried out at least 25 drone strikes in the last month in Pakistan's tribal areas - the highest monthly total for the past six years, US media reported.

The US has been pushing Pakistan to increase their search for the militants, who are believed to be hiding in a mountainous border region in the country.





Enhanced by Zemanta