Monday, November 21, 2011
Thursday, November 17, 2011
We Can't Afford to Nominate a Counterfeit Conservative
RON PAUL
A TRUE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE
![]() Dear Choice America Network readers, Republican voters aren't fickle. They're not just looking for another
"flavor of the month."
What voters want is a solid conservative candidate who can take on
and defeat BOTH Mitt Romney and President Obama in 2012.
It's just that as soon as voters start to learn more about my Republican
opponents, they realize they don't fit the bill!
Well, as a recent poll in Iowa showing me statistically tied for first
place proved, and another in New Hampshire placing me clearly in
second place showed, my unapologetic conservatism is winning the day.
Of course, this isn't by accident or sheer luck. I've been campaigning
hard in Iowa and New Hampshire for months.
And while I've never been given a fair shake by the national media,
I've also understood that as people learn more about the records of
my opponents - whether that's Newt Gingrich or Herman Cain - it's
only a matter of time until they're exposed as counterfeits.
That's why my campaign's strategy has always been to talk directly
to good folks like you who truly care about the direction of our country
and understand that you and I just can't afford to continue "politics
as usual."
Unfortunately, as many voters are now finding out, "politics as usual"
is really what every other "top-tier" Republican alternative to Mitt Romney
even pretend to. His answer is to simply ignore Washington, D.C.'s
spending problem.
Instead, his "9-9-9" plan raises taxes on 84% of the American people. Herman Cain has also supported TARP and publicly rejected the idea
of eliminating federal agencies. He even went on radio mocking those
supporting an Audit of the Federal Reserve - asking them to call up the
Fed's PR Department if they wanted information!
Of course, not long afterward, we found out the Federal Reserve made
available 16 TRILLION in American taxpayer dollars during the last
economic crisis - many of it to banks overseas!
And this isn't worth looking into? Sadly, Newt Gingrich's record could even be worse. Whether it's calling for a health insurance mandate like that of
both ObamaCare and RomneyCare or supporting "Cap and Tax"
and the $700 BILLION TARP bailout, even standing next to
Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich is hardly a conservative champion.
Just consider the estimated $1.6 million he was paid by Freddie Mac
to help keep the housing bubble expanding even while I was warning
Congress that this would lead to disaster for the American economy.
Considering the times we're facing, nominating another counterfeit is
the last thing we need.
As voters are finding out - despite the best efforts of the national media -
I am the candidate who has the conservative message not only to win the
presidency but to turn our country around.
![]() During my entire time in Congress, I've been warning about the dangers
of Big Government, out-of-control spending, and runaway inflation.
And I'm the only candidate to predict the current economic mess we're
in right now.
In 2003, I predicted the Housing crisis and pushed to get the government
out of the mortgage business.
In 2008, I fought TARP and the Fed when they laid waste to our economy,
while others in this race applauded their disastrous Big Government
intervention.
And unlike my opponents and most people in Congress, I am absolutely
ready to enact real spending cuts, right now.
In fact, my Plan to Restore America cuts $1 trillion in federal spending
during the first year of my presidency by eliminating five federal
departments that I can actually name - Education, Energy, Commerce,
Housing and Urban Development, and Interior.
As President, I'll balance the budget by year three without cutting one
penny from our veterans, one penny from our senior citizens, or one
penny from our national defense.
That's what sets me apart - my plan, my record of being right while
others were wrong, and my unmatched and unwavering record of
fighting for fiscal responsibility and constitutional principles.
In a nutshell, it's my conservatism that's winning the day. ![]() Once people learn about my support for the Second Amendment
and the Right to Life, and my unmatched record on spending in
Congress, they realize I am the true conservative alternative to
Mitt Romney.
And when they learn that I'm a man of faith, a military veteran -
having served five years in the Air Force during the turbulent 1960s
- and that I've received more money from our active duty troops
than all my Republican opponents COMBINED, they realize I'm the
Republican to take on and DEFEAT President Obama in 2012.
Unlike my opponents, I'm not running from my voting record. I'm not running from my public statements. I'm not running
from my predictions.
I'm running on them. And I'm asking for your support. These are troubling times for our country - times that call for
conservative leadership.
Counterfeits won't cut it. As I run for President, I want to make sure our Party keeps its
strong commitment to limited constitutional government and
free market solutions.
The only way to do that is to nominate someone in 2012 who
predicted the economic crisis long before it happened. Someone
who has conviction and has fought against Big Government in
Washington his entire career.
And if you are so moved, I'd appreciate it if you would consider
contributing to my Presidential campaign, as well. I don't
have big corporations or special interests behind my campaign.
But I do have hundreds of thousands of individuals who care
about getting our economy moving in the right direction again.
Whatever you can do, $500, $250, $100, or even $50,
will help.
Together, you and I can Restore America Now. For Liberty, ![]() Ron Paul P.S. Considering the trouble our country is facing, we can't
afford to nominate a counterfeit conservative.
Now, a recent article by CBS rightly notes, "New poll shows
4-way tie in Iowa as Ron Paul moves to top tier." And another
poll in New Hampshire shows me clearly in second place.
I'm in this race to win it, and today I'm asking for your support. If you believe our Party must nominate a true conservative, |
Saturday, November 12, 2011
'Until Their Children Wake-Up Homeless",....

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous
to our liberties
than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to
control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive
the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered."
than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to
control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation,
the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive
the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered."
Related articles
- Here's What Thomas Jefferson Thought About Banks (businessinsider.com)
- Thomas Jefferson (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Consumer Vs. Corporation, who is really "consuming" who? (relampo.wordpress.com)
- A Repbulic Not a Democracy (mycoignofvantage.wordpress.com)
- Homeless !!! (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
- Thomas Jefferson: Liberty Is The Gift Of God (samuelatgilgal.wordpress.com)
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Monday, November 7, 2011
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Ron Paul 2012
Support Ron Paul for President
The Best and Only Real Choice for America's Future
Related articles
- Ron Paul Could Win The GOP Nomination! (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)
- Ron Paul Gains Number One Spot Again! (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)
- Ron Paul Attacks Radical Money Printers and War Propagandists (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)
- Ron Paul's Full Speech at the Value Voters Summit 2011 (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)
- Full Bloomberg / Washington Post GOP Debate in New Hampshire (Ron Paul Wins!) (newsworldwide.wordpress.com)
- Save the Country! Help Ron Paul NOW! (midnight deadline) (moanti.wordpress.com)
- Presidential Leader Ron Paul: Highlights of GOP CNN Debate - Las Vegas (politicalvelcraft.org)
- Leader Of The 2012 Presidential Candidates Ron Paul: Most Consistent Unrelenting Champion of Liberty. (politicalvelcraft.org)
- Vegas Debate: Ron Paul rips Herman Cain over Occupy Wall Street (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Facebook tracks your every move, even after logging out
Facebook
The Privacy-Breaching Nightmare
(NaturalNews)
The social media empire Facebook has unveiled some new "features" on its
platform in recent days that many allege are a total and compete
privacy-breaching nightmare. But one hidden feature, discovered by Nik
Cubrilovic, an Australian entrepreneur and writer, that few people are aware of
is the fact that Facebook now monitors your online activity, even when you are
not logged in to the service.
With each new change Facebook makes, users' privacy becomes a little less ... nonexistent, if you will. The most recent "News Feed" modifications, for example, display everything you say and do on the site to all of your "friends," and even to the public. And now, even after logging out of Facebook, permanent "cookies" track all your movements on websites that contain Facebook buttons or widgets.
With each new change Facebook makes, users' privacy becomes a little less ... nonexistent, if you will. The most recent "News Feed" modifications, for example, display everything you say and do on the site to all of your "friends," and even to the public. And now, even after logging out of Facebook, permanent "cookies" track all your movements on websites that contain Facebook buttons or widgets.
"Even
if you are logged out, Facebook still knows and can track every page you visit,"
Cubrilovic wrote on a recent blog posting. "The only solution is to delete every
Facebook cookie in your browser, or to use a separate browser for Facebook
interactions" (http://nikcub-static.appspot.com/lo...).
But how many Facebook users will actually know to do this? The site has never announced to its users that it is even tracking them in the first place, let alone given them any instructions on how to "opt-out" of this egregious invasion of privacy.
Facebook, of course, has become infamous for simply changing its site setup, including privacy settings, and leaving it up to users to figure out how to contain their breached information after the fact. It has switched from an "opt-in" approach, where users used to be given the option to "upgrade" to new features, to a much more complicated "opt-out" approach, where Facebook makes drastic changes and leaves it up to users to somehow figure out how to change things back to the way they were (if such an option is even still possible).
"While initially opt-in, the default then seems to be expose everything," says David Vaile, executive director of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre, concerning Facebook's "breathtaking and audacious grab for whole life data."
"Facebook, once again, are (sic) doing things that are beyond most users' capacity to understand while reducing their privacy ... the default setting for any site should be 'reveal nothing about me unless I make a specific choice otherwise.'"
Sources for this article include:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/te...
But how many Facebook users will actually know to do this? The site has never announced to its users that it is even tracking them in the first place, let alone given them any instructions on how to "opt-out" of this egregious invasion of privacy.
Facebook, of course, has become infamous for simply changing its site setup, including privacy settings, and leaving it up to users to figure out how to contain their breached information after the fact. It has switched from an "opt-in" approach, where users used to be given the option to "upgrade" to new features, to a much more complicated "opt-out" approach, where Facebook makes drastic changes and leaves it up to users to somehow figure out how to change things back to the way they were (if such an option is even still possible).
"While initially opt-in, the default then seems to be expose everything," says David Vaile, executive director of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) Cyberspace Law and Policy Centre, concerning Facebook's "breathtaking and audacious grab for whole life data."
"Facebook, once again, are (sic) doing things that are beyond most users' capacity to understand while reducing their privacy ... the default setting for any site should be 'reveal nothing about me unless I make a specific choice otherwise.'"
Sources for this article include:
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/te...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)